Testversjon. Tallmaterialet er ikke kvalitetssikret og må ikke
brukes som grunnlag for prosjektering eller beslutninger.
Om tjenesten
Framklim utvikles for å gi historiske og framtidige klimadata for norske kommuner og
værstasjoner til bruk i bygningsfysiske analyser fra tidlig planlegging til detaljprosjektering.
Tjenesten kobler døgnverdier og framtidsscenarioer fra Klima i Norge 2025 med
timesoppløste reanalyser, og leverer komplette timesoppløste klimafiler for
bygningssimulering sammen med kartlag for utvalgte klimaindikatorer.
Framklim utvikles av SINTEF. Tjenesten er en testversjon som deles for
tilbakemelding; se bruksvilkårene.
Slik lages dataene
Historisk referanse. Døgnverdier for temperatur og nedbør fra
seNorge2018 (1 km) og referansedatasettet i Klima i Norge 2025 gir den historiske
døgnreferansen for hvert sted. Referansedatasettet (seNorge2018 v20.05) forlenges
fra 2020 til i dag med seNorge2018 v23.09, justert for konsistens med referansen.
Framtidsklima. Klima i Norge 2025 gir kvantiljusterte (EQM)
døgnframskrivninger for scenarioet SSP3-7.0 fra ti modellkjeder, der globale
klimamodeller fra CMIP6 er nedskalert med regionale klimamodeller.
Avhengighetskorreksjon. Framtidsseriene korrigeres deretter med metoden
3DBC for at samvariasjonen mellom variabler og over tid skal samsvare bedre med den
historiske referanseserien i referanseperioden 1991–2020.
Timesoppløsning. Døgnverdiene bygges ut til timeserier med mønstre
fra NORA3 (temperatur, nedbør, vind) og ERA5 (fuktighet, trykk, stråling).
I tillegg kalibreres temperaturens døgnforløp mot MET Nordic Analysis.
Validering. De rekonstruerte historiske seriene kontrolleres mot
kvalitetssikrede stasjonsobservasjoner fra Frost, Meteorologisk institutts tjeneste
for observasjonsdata (frost.met.no).
Kartlag. Graddager, nullgjennomgangsdøgn, snø- og frostindikatorer
og returverdier for varmeste 5-døgnsperiode og kaldeste 3-døgnsperiode beregnes på
1 km-rutenettet. For hver
250 m-rute velges deretter den 1 km-ruten som er mest representativ for rutens
høyde. Rutenettet kartet vises på, er dermed finere enn den effektive oppløsningen i
klimagrunnlaget.
Slagregnkart. Slagregnkartet følger en egen metodikk, utviklet i
forskningsprosjektet CliVa, der vind nedskaleres til 50 m med hensyn til terrengets
leside og eksponering. Kartet vises på 250 m-rutenettet, der hver rute er
arealveid middelverdi av 50 m-rutene den dekker. Under verdien for et valgt punkt
oppgis spredningen mellom disse 50 m-rutene, slik at det går fram hvor
representativt middeltallet er for ruten. Verdien er slagregnindeksen etter
ISO 15927-3 for en fritt eksponert vegg i åpent terreng. Standardkartet teller
bare regn, det vil si timer der lufttemperaturen i NORA3 er minst 1 °C i 2 m
høyde, fordi ISO 15927-3 er en indeks for slagregn. Et eget kart teller all
nedbør, også snø. Som landsgjennomsnitt gir det omtrent dobbelt så høye verdier,
og det er ikke standardens indeks. Terrengets virkning er
allerede med i tallet; ruhet fra vegetasjon og bebyggelse, skjerming fra nabobygg og
veggens egen geometri kommer i tillegg og kan korrigeres med egne reduksjonsfaktorer etter standarden.
Sommertemperatur. Siden viser temperaturen i den 50. varmeste timen
hvert år 2014–2026, utetemperaturen veiledningen til TEK17 § 13-4 fortsatt viser til, og
sammenligner den med høyeste 5-døgnsmiddel for valgt returperiode etter
NS 3031:2025, som også finnes som kartlag for hvert punkt.
50-timerstemperaturen er beregnet fra timesverdier i MET Nordic Analysis v4 på 1 km og
tilordnet 250 m-ruter med et høyde- og avstandsbevisst oppslag. MET Nordic Analysis korrigerer
værmodellen MEPS med offisielle stasjoner og private værstasjoner (bl.a. Netatmo), de fleste i
bebygde områder. MET Nordic Analysis gir verdier på 1 km-rutenett og er ikke det samme som en
standardplassert stasjonsmåling; der analysen følger en offisiell stasjon, er verdiene
stasjonens egne. Siden gir ikke døgnforløpet i dimensjonerende døgn, men
viser til kommunesenterverdiene hos
Klimadata for bygninger (NMBU).
Metoden beskrives steg for steg i bakgrunnshistoriene og i
en metodeartikkel som er under arbeid.
Datakilder og kreditering
Framklim bygger på data fra tredjeparter. Rettighetene til underliggende data forblir
hos rettighetshaverne, og lisensene og krediteringskravene under gjelder ved videre
bruk.
Data som Framklim selv produserer, er lisensiert under
CC BY 4.0. Krediter
«Framklim, SINTEF» i tillegg til kildene under. Se
bruksvilkårene.
Datasett
Bruk i Framklim
Produsent, lisens og kreditering
Klima i Norge 2025
Biasjusterte døgnframskrivninger (SSP3-7.0) og historisk referanse; framtidige kartlag.
Norsk klimaservicesenter (Meteorologisk institutt, NVE, NORCE og Bjerknessenteret). Bygger på globale klimamodeller fra CMIP6 og regionale nedskaleringer. Se Datagrunnlag for klimaframskrivninger.
seNorge2018
Døgnverdier for temperatur og nedbør (1 km). v20.05 via referansedatasettet i Klima i Norge 2025, v23.09 for forlengelsen fra 2020 til i dag. Grunnlag for graddager, nullgjennomgangsdøgn, snø- og frostindikatorer og returverdier for 5- og 3-døgnsmiddel.
Meteorologisk institutt. NLOD / CC BY 4.0. «Data fra Meteorologisk institutt.»
NORA3
Timesoppløste mønstre for temperatur, nedbør og vind; slagregnklimatologi.
Meteorologisk institutt. CC BY 4.0. «Basert på data fra Meteorologisk institutt.»
ERA5
Timesoppløste mønstre for fuktighet, trykk og stråling; døgnreferanse for fuktighet, trykk og stråling (kort- og langbølget) via HySN2018-ERA5 (NVE).
Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) / ECMWF. CC BY 4.0. «Contains modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information 2026. Neither the European Commission nor ECMWF is responsible for any use that may be made of the Copernicus information or data it contains.»
MET Nordic Analysis
Kalibrering av temperaturens døgnforløp; 50-timerstemperatur per år 2014–2026 (Sommertemperatur).
Meteorologisk institutt. CC BY 4.0.
Frost
Stasjonskatalog og kvalitetssikrede observasjoner til validering.
Meteorologisk institutt, frost.met.no. NLOD / CC BY 4.0.
Bakgrunnskart
Gråtonekart i kartvisningen og i bakgrunnshistoriene.
Rutenettet kartlagene vises på, med terrenghøyde for valg av representativ 1 km-rute.
Statistisk sentralbyrå. NLOD.
Publikasjoner og referanser
Framklim-publikasjoner
Skeie, Gaarder & Time (2026). From Days to Hours: Evaluating Granularity of
Weather Data for Building Physics Analysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and
Environmental Science 1615, 012062.
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1615/1/012062
Studier som bruker klimafilene
Asphaug, Skeie & Time (2026). Interior insulation of historic timber buildings:
moisture risk under current and future climates. Nordic Symposium on Building
Physics (NSB 2026). Akseptert for publisering.
Bakgrunn og forarbeid
Skeie, K. S. (2026). Tracking and Verifying Energy Performance of Norwegian
Residential Buildings: Methods for modeling and information pooling by utilizing
open datasets. Doktoravhandling, NTNU, 2026:228.
Skeie & Gustavsen (2025). Impact of kilometer-scale temperature and wind
variability on simulated building heating demand. Preprint (ikke fagfellevurdert),
SSRN. doi:10.2139/ssrn.5946028
Gaarder et al. (2023). Building Adaptation Measures Using Future Climate
Scenarios—A Scoping Review of Uncertainty Treatment and Communication.
Buildings 13(6), 1460.
doi:10.3390/buildings13061460
Lisø, Kvande & Time (2017). Climate Adaptation Framework for Moisture-resilient
Buildings in Norway. Energy Procedia 132, 628–633.
doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.698
Datagrunnlag
Huang et al. (2026). An improved modelling chain for bias-adjusted high-resolution
climate and hydrological projections for Norway. Geoscientific Model
Development 19, 4567–4599.
doi:10.5194/gmd-19-4567-2026
Eyring et al. (2016). Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6
(CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development
9, 1937–1958.
doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
Lussana et al. (2019). seNorge_2018, daily precipitation, and temperature datasets
over Norway. Earth System Science Data 11, 1531–1551.
doi:10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019
Haakenstad et al. (2021). NORA3: A nonhydrostatic high-resolution hindcast of the
North Sea, the Norwegian Sea, and the Barents Sea. Journal of Applied Meteorology
and Climatology 60, 1443–1464.
doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0029.1
Hersbach et al. (2020). The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the
Royal Meteorological Society 146, 1999–2049.
doi:10.1002/qj.3803
Erlandsen, Tallaksen & Kristiansen (2019). Merits of novel high-resolution
estimates and existing long-term estimates of humidity and incident radiation in a
complex domain. Earth System Science Data 11, 797–821.
doi:10.5194/essd-11-797-2019
Metode
Framklims beregninger bygger på metodene under, men er tilpasset norske forhold og
datagrunnlaget. De avviker derfor på enkelte punkter fra framgangsmåtene i standardene
det vises til.
3DBC
Mehrotra & Sharma (2019). A resampling approach for correcting systematic
spatiotemporal biases for multiple variables in a changing climate. Water
Resources Research 55, 754–770.
doi:10.1029/2018WR023270
Sharma, Mehrotra & Kusumastuti (2023). Correcting systematic bias in derived
hydrologic simulations — implications for climate change assessments. Journal of
Water and Climate Change 14(7), 2085–2102.
doi:10.2166/wcc.2023.230
Typiske og ekstreme år
Pernigotto, Prada & Gasparella (2020). Extreme reference years for building
energy performance simulation. Journal of Building Performance Simulation
13(2), 152–166.
doi:10.1080/19401493.2019.1585477
Thiis, Petersen, Fuglestvedt & Hygen (2025). Typical meteorological years tailored
for high latitudes based on high-resolution reanalysis data. Journal of Building
Performance Simulation.
doi:10.1080/19401493.2025.2573724
Metoden bak TMY-NO fra Meteorologisk institutt og NMBU, som ligger til grunn for de
typiske månedene i NS 3031:2025:
Klimadata for bygninger.
Fuktreferanseår
Geving, S. (1997). Moisture design of building constructions: Hygrothermal
analysis using simulation models. Doktoravhandling, NTNU.
NS-EN 15026:2023. Hygrothermal performance of building components and building
elements — Assessment of moisture transfer by numerical simulation, Annex B.
Vandemeulebroucke, I., Caluwaerts, S. & Van Den Bossche, N. (2022). Decision
framework to select moisture reference years for hygrothermal simulations.
Building and Environment, 218.
doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109080
Returverdier for temperatur
Hygen, Grinde & Tajet (2023). Calculation of design temperatures: Proposed use of
Bayesian GEV to calculate design summer and design winter temperatures.
MET report 02/2023. Meteorologisk institutt.
Slagregn
Rydock, Lisø, Førland, Nore & Thue (2005). A driving rain exposure index for
Norway. Building and Environment 40, 1450–1458.
doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.018
ISO 15927-3:2009. Hygrothermal performance of buildings — Calculation and
presentation of climatic data — Part 3: Calculation of a driving rain index for
vertical surfaces from hourly wind and rain data.
Byggforskserien (2023). Klimadata for dimensjonering mot regnpåkjenning.
BKS 451.031, SINTEF. ISSN 2387-6328.
Frostsprenging og nullpunktskryssinger
Lisø, Kvande, Hygen, Thue & Harstveit (2007). A frost decay exposure index for
porous, mineral building materials. Building and Environment 42, 3547–3555.
doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.022
Gaarder, Tajet, Dobler, Hygen & Kvande (2024). Future Climate Projections and
Uncertainty Evaluations for Frost Decay Exposure Index in Norway. Buildings
14(9), 2873.
doi:10.3390/buildings14092873
Råtefare
Lisø, Hygen, Kvande & Thue (2006). Decay potential in wood structures using
climate data. Building Research & Information 34(6), 546–551.
doi:10.1080/09613210600736248
Hygen, Øyen & Almås (2011). Assessment of climate vulnerability in the Norwegian
built environment. Advances in Science and Research 6, 151–153.
doi:10.5194/asr-6-151-2011
Tajet & Hygen (2017). Potential risk of wood decay. MET report 08/2017.
Meteorologisk institutt.
Bakgrunnshistorier Eksperimentell demo
Fire interaktive historier viser metoden steg for steg, fra historiske referanser og
klimaframskrivninger gjennom avhengighetskorreksjon til komplette timesoppløste
værfiler. De er en eksperimentell demonstrasjon: forklaringene er forenklet, tallene er
eksempler fra et lite arbeidssett, og sidene kan endres eller fjernes.
Framklim er utviklet av SINTEF Community med grunnbevilgningsmidler for 2024–2026.
Metodikken for framtidsklima, med 3DBC-basert konstruksjon av timesoppløste
klimafiler, er utviklet i dette arbeidet.
Datainfrastrukturen, temperaturkorreksjonen av timesoppløste reanalyser og valget av
representativ rute bygger på doktorgradsarbeidet Tracking and Verifying Energy
Performance of Norwegian Residential Buildings ved NTNU, Institutt for arkitektur
og teknologi, finansiert gjennom Forskningssenter for nullutslippsområder i smarte byer
(FME ZEN), Norges forskningsråd, med NTNU og SINTEF som forskningspartnere.
Slagregnkartet er utviklet i CliVa
(Detect and mitigate climate change risk damage for optimal property value
preservation), et innovasjonsprosjekt i næringslivet finansiert av
Norges forskningsråd, prosjekt 355516.
Test version. The figures have not been quality assured and must
not be used as a basis for design or decisions.
The service
Framklim is being developed to provide historical and future climate data for Norwegian
municipalities and weather stations for use in building physics analysis from early planning through
detailed design. It connects daily data and future scenario projections from Klima i
Norge 2025 with hourly reanalyses, and delivers complete hourly climate files for
building simulation together with map layers for selected climate indicators.
Framklim is developed by SINTEF. The service is a test version shared for feedback;
see the terms of use.
How the data is made
Historical reference. Daily temperature and precipitation from
seNorge2018 (1 km) and the reference dataset of Klima i Norge 2025 give the
historical daily reference for each location. The reference dataset (seNorge2018
v20.05) is extended from 2020 to the present with seNorge2018 v23.09, adjusted for
consistency with the reference.
Future climate. Klima i Norge 2025 provides quantile-adjusted (EQM)
daily projections for scenario SSP3-7.0 from ten model chains, in which global climate
models from CMIP6 are downscaled with regional climate models.
Dependence correction. The future series are then corrected with the
3DBC method so that the co-variation between variables and over time agrees more
closely with the historical reference series in the 1991–2020 reference period.
Hourly resolution. Daily values are expanded to hourly series with
patterns from NORA3 (temperature, precipitation, wind) and ERA5 (humidity, pressure,
radiation). In addition, the within-day temperature profile is calibrated against
the MET Nordic Analysis.
Validation. The reconstructed historical series are checked against
quality-controlled station observations from Frost, the Norwegian Meteorological
Institute’s observation data service (frost.met.no).
Map layers. Degree days, zero-crossing days, snow and frost
indicators and return levels of the hottest 5-day and coldest 3-day periods are
computed on the 1 km grid. For
each 250 m cell, the 1 km cell most representative of the cell’s elevation is
then selected. The grid the map is drawn on is therefore finer than the effective
resolution of the climate data.
Wind-driven rain map. The wind-driven rain map follows a separate
method, developed in the CliVa research project, in which wind is downscaled to
50 m accounting for terrain lee and exposure. The map is shown on the 250 m grid,
each cell being the area-weighted mean of the 50 m cells it covers. Beneath the
value for a chosen point, the spread among those 50 m cells is given, so it is
clear how representative the mean is of the site. The value is the ISO 15927-3
index for a freely exposed wall in open country. The default map counts rain
only, that is hours in which the NORA3 air temperature at 2 m is at least
1 °C, since ISO 15927-3 is a driving-rain index. A second map counts all
precipitation, snow included. On a national average its values are about twice
as high, and it is not the standard’s index. The effect of the terrain is
already in the figure; roughness from vegetation and buildings, shelter from
neighbouring structures and the wall’s own geometry come on top and are
corrected for according to the standard.
Summer temperature. The page shows the temperature of the 50th hottest
hour of each year 2016–2025, the outdoor temperature the guidance to TEK17
§ 13-4 still refers to, and compares it with the highest 5-day mean at a chosen
return period under NS 3031:2025, which is also a map layer for every point. The 50-hour temperature is computed from hourly MET Nordic Analysis v4 values at 1 km and assigned to
250 m cells by an elevation- and distance-aware lookup. MET Nordic Analysis corrects the MEPS
weather model with official stations and citizen weather stations (Netatmo among others), most of
them in built-up areas. MET Nordic Analysis gives values on a 1 km grid and is not the same as
a standard-sited station measurement; where the analysis follows an official station,
the values are the station’s own. The page does not give the diurnal course of
the design day; it refers to the
municipal-centre values at
Klimadata for bygninger (NMBU).
The method is described step by step in the background
stories and in a methods paper in preparation.
Data sources and credits
Framklim is built on third-party data. Rights to the underlying data remain with
their rights holders, and the licences and attribution requirements below apply to
any further use.
Data produced by Framklim itself are licensed under
CC BY 4.0. Credit
“Framklim, SINTEF” in addition to the sources below. See the
terms of use.
Dataset
Use in Framklim
Producer, licence and credit
Klima i Norge 2025
Bias-adjusted daily projections (SSP3-7.0) and historical reference; future map layers.
Norwegian Centre for Climate Services (MET Norway, NVE, NORCE and the Bjerknes Centre). Built on CMIP6 global climate models and regional downscaling. See Datagrunnlag for klimaframskrivninger.
seNorge2018
Daily temperature and precipitation (1 km). v20.05 via the Klima i Norge 2025 reference dataset, v23.09 for the extension from 2020 to the present. Basis for degree days, zero-crossing days, snow and frost indicators and the 5-day and 3-day return levels.
MET Norway. NLOD / CC BY 4.0. “Data from the Norwegian Meteorological Institute.”
NORA3
Hourly patterns for temperature, precipitation and wind; wind-driven rain climatology.
MET Norway. CC BY 4.0. “Based on data from MET Norway.”
ERA5
Hourly patterns for humidity, pressure and radiation; daily reference for humidity, pressure and radiation (shortwave and longwave) via HySN2018-ERA5 (NVE).
Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) / ECMWF. CC BY 4.0. “Contains modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information 2026. Neither the European Commission nor ECMWF is responsible for any use that may be made of the Copernicus information or data it contains.”
MET Nordic Analysis
Calibration of the within-day temperature profile; 50-hour temperature per year 2016–2025 (Summer temperature).
MET Norway. CC BY 4.0.
Frost
Station catalogue and quality-controlled observations for validation.
The grid the map layers are shown on, with terrain elevation used to select the representative 1 km cell.
Statistics Norway. NLOD.
Publications and references
Framklim publications
Skeie, Gaarder & Time (2026). From Days to Hours: Evaluating Granularity of
Weather Data for Building Physics Analysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and
Environmental Science 1615, 012062.
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1615/1/012062
Studies using the climate files
Asphaug, Skeie & Time (2026). Interior insulation of historic timber buildings:
moisture risk under current and future climates. Nordic Symposium on Building
Physics (NSB 2026). Accepted for publication.
Background and precursor work
Skeie, K. S. (2026). Tracking and Verifying Energy Performance of Norwegian
Residential Buildings: Methods for modeling and information pooling by utilizing
open datasets. Doctoral theses at NTNU, 2026:228.
Skeie & Gustavsen (2025). Impact of kilometer-scale temperature and wind
variability on simulated building heating demand. Preprint (not peer reviewed),
SSRN. doi:10.2139/ssrn.5946028
Gaarder et al. (2023). Building Adaptation Measures Using Future Climate
Scenarios—A Scoping Review of Uncertainty Treatment and Communication.
Buildings 13(6), 1460.
doi:10.3390/buildings13061460
Lisø, Kvande & Time (2017). Climate Adaptation Framework for Moisture-resilient
Buildings in Norway. Energy Procedia 132, 628–633.
doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.698
Data
Huang et al. (2026). An improved modelling chain for bias-adjusted high-resolution
climate and hydrological projections for Norway. Geoscientific Model
Development 19, 4567–4599.
doi:10.5194/gmd-19-4567-2026
Eyring et al. (2016). Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6
(CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development
9, 1937–1958.
doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
Lussana et al. (2019). seNorge_2018, daily precipitation, and temperature datasets
over Norway. Earth System Science Data 11, 1531–1551.
doi:10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019
Haakenstad et al. (2021). NORA3: A nonhydrostatic high-resolution hindcast of the
North Sea, the Norwegian Sea, and the Barents Sea. Journal of Applied Meteorology
and Climatology 60, 1443–1464.
doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0029.1
Hersbach et al. (2020). The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the
Royal Meteorological Society 146, 1999–2049.
doi:10.1002/qj.3803
Erlandsen, Tallaksen & Kristiansen (2019). Merits of novel high-resolution
estimates and existing long-term estimates of humidity and incident radiation in a
complex domain. Earth System Science Data 11, 797–821.
doi:10.5194/essd-11-797-2019
Methods
The Framklim calculations follow the methods below, but are adapted to Norwegian
conditions and to the underlying data. They therefore deviate on some points from the
procedures in the standards referred to.
3DBC
Mehrotra & Sharma (2019). A resampling approach for correcting systematic
spatiotemporal biases for multiple variables in a changing climate. Water
Resources Research 55, 754–770.
doi:10.1029/2018WR023270
Sharma, Mehrotra & Kusumastuti (2023). Correcting systematic bias in derived
hydrologic simulations — implications for climate change assessments. Journal of
Water and Climate Change 14(7), 2085–2102.
doi:10.2166/wcc.2023.230
Typical and extreme years
Pernigotto, Prada & Gasparella (2020). Extreme reference years for building
energy performance simulation. Journal of Building Performance Simulation
13(2), 152–166.
doi:10.1080/19401493.2019.1585477
Thiis, Petersen, Fuglestvedt & Hygen (2025). Typical meteorological years tailored
for high latitudes based on high-resolution reanalysis data. Journal of Building
Performance Simulation.
doi:10.1080/19401493.2025.2573724
The method behind TMY-NO from the Norwegian Meteorological Institute and NMBU, which
underpins the typical months in NS 3031:2025:
Klimadata for bygninger.
Moisture reference years
Geving, S. (1997). Moisture design of building constructions: Hygrothermal
analysis using simulation models. Doctoral thesis, NTNU.
NS-EN 15026:2023. Hygrothermal performance of building components and building
elements — Assessment of moisture transfer by numerical simulation, Annex B.
Vandemeulebroucke, I., Caluwaerts, S. & Van Den Bossche, N. (2022). Decision
framework to select moisture reference years for hygrothermal simulations.
Building and Environment, 218.
doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109080
Temperature return levels
Hygen, Grinde & Tajet (2023). Calculation of design temperatures: Proposed use of
Bayesian GEV to calculate design summer and design winter temperatures.
MET report 02/2023. Norwegian Meteorological Institute.
Wind-driven rain
Rydock, Lisø, Førland, Nore & Thue (2005). A driving rain exposure index for
Norway. Building and Environment 40, 1450–1458.
doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.018
ISO 15927-3:2009. Hygrothermal performance of buildings — Calculation and
presentation of climatic data — Part 3: Calculation of a driving rain index for
vertical surfaces from hourly wind and rain data.
Byggforskserien (2023). Klimadata for dimensjonering mot regnpåkjenning.
BKS 451.031, SINTEF. ISSN 2387-6328.
Frost decay and freeze–thaw cycles
Lisø, Kvande, Hygen, Thue & Harstveit (2007). A frost decay exposure index for
porous, mineral building materials. Building and Environment 42, 3547–3555.
doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.022
Gaarder, Tajet, Dobler, Hygen & Kvande (2024). Future Climate Projections and
Uncertainty Evaluations for Frost Decay Exposure Index in Norway. Buildings
14(9), 2873.
doi:10.3390/buildings14092873
Wood decay risk
Lisø, Hygen, Kvande & Thue (2006). Decay potential in wood structures using
climate data. Building Research & Information 34(6), 546–551.
doi:10.1080/09613210600736248
Hygen, Øyen & Almås (2011). Assessment of climate vulnerability in the Norwegian
built environment. Advances in Science and Research 6, 151–153.
doi:10.5194/asr-6-151-2011
Four interactive stories show the method step by step, from the historical reference
and climate projections through dependence correction to complete hourly weather
files. They are an experimental demonstration: the explanations are simplified, the
figures are examples from a small working set, and the pages may change or be
removed.
Framklim is developed by SINTEF Community with basic institutional funding for
2024–2026. The future-climate methodology, with 3DBC-based construction of hourly
climate files, was developed in this work.
The data infrastructure, the temperature correction of hourly reanalyses and the
representative grid-cell selection build on the doctoral thesis Tracking and
Verifying Energy Performance of Norwegian Residential Buildings at NTNU,
Department of Architecture and Technology, funded through the Research Centre on Zero
Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities (FME ZEN), the Research Council of Norway,
with NTNU and SINTEF as research partners.
The wind-driven rain map was developed in CliVa
(Detect and mitigate climate change risk damage for optimal property value
preservation), an Innovation Project for the Industrial Sector funded by the
Research Council of Norway, project 355516.